Add to:

Facebook! MySpace! Reddit! Del.icio.us! Google! Yahoo! Live! StumbleUpon! Newsvine!

Do you support the RTA's proposal for a footbridge across the Spit?
     
Change Font Size: A A A A
NSW Treasurer Unsure How Fed Bank Guarantees Impact NSW
Tuesday, 14 October 2008

 

“I will ask the Treasury Secretary to answer that” Treasurer Eric Roozendaal in response to question about Federal Government’s rescue package for banks, Budget Estimates 14-10-08

The Federal Government’s decision to guarantee all debt issuance of Australia's banks may have an unintended impact on State Government finances according to NSW Treasury, however NSW Treasurer Eric Roozendaal is unable to clarify, Shadow Finance Minister Mike Baird said today.

"At a time when governments across the world are determining appropriate steps to combat the financial crisis, the NSW Treasurer is delegating all the heavy lifting,” Mr Baird said.

“In the Budget Estimates hearings, Mr Roozendaal was unable to answer the Opposition’s question on the likely impact of the Federal Government’s bank guarantees announced on the weekend.

“Mr Roozendaal deferred to the Secretary of NSW Treasury, Mr John Pierce, who confirmed discussions were taking place on the issue.

"While we welcome Kevin Rudd's attempt to shore up Australia's financial institutions, NSW needs to be aware of the impact of these actions on our State Government finances.

"The market has questioned whether the cost of borrowing may now go up in NSW,” Mr Baird said.

“It is also likely access to funding for infrastructure may be more difficult for the NSW Government now, given the improved credit profile of Aussie banks.

"The NSW Treasurer should be asking questions about the fee arrangements that Kevin Rudd and Wayne Swan are putting in place and whether these actions are inadvertently impacting the States.

“If they are, there may be a need for the Federal Government to guarantee State debt to ensure NSW is not punished financially and funds are available,” Mr Baird said.

“Unfortunately the NSW Treasurer has demonstrated he has no grasp of this significant development on State finances.” 

 
MEDIA: Lisa Harrington - 0406 726 880 

Add to:

Facebook! MySpace! Reddit! Del.icio.us! Google! Yahoo! Live! StumbleUpon! Newsvine!

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
Name:
E-mail
Subject:
Comment:

Code:* Code




Comments (2)
RSS comments
State finances
Hi Mike 
You may remember me from Christchurch St Ives. 
I heard recently how proud the State Govt was to announce they will be in the black 2 years before expected. As a small business owner paying many different categories of taxes and compulsory charges such as Workers comp ins, and ever increasing CTP premiums on company vehicles etc, I would like to hear talk about value for my tax dollars. We would all love governments to talk about delivering us less taxes and great value for our dollar - not just a stupid comment like "we will have a surplus". Please try to deliver great value for our taxes when you are in power - speed on the liberal victory. 
Best regards,
Posted by: Peter Munro at 29-06-2010 12:05
Public sector waste
Dear Mr Baird, 
 
In these times of financial difficulty, I believe that we all need take difficult decisions. 
 
I believe that it is an issue of equity that many retired public servants who receive (in many instances) generous pensions are able to obtain additional employment without any impact on the Government paid pensions. 
 
By way of example you (we) pay pensions equivilent to full pay to many public servants and police officers (many well over $100,000) who cannot work for the Government/NSWPF due to physical and psychological injury, but appear able to work for private companies often in similar roles (security, investigation, management etc). 
 
Our ‘aged’ pensioners have their pensions reduced where they have additional employment, whilst many of the above recipients of generous pensions are free to work in productive and financially secure employment whilst still getting an additional ‘free handout’ from the state Government and the taxpayers. 
 
Whilst I fully support those who need the assistance of the Government, I find it difficult to accept that many others are given excessive advantage not availble to the rest of the community, compliments of the hardworking state taxpayer.. 
 
It is my respectfull submission that all pensions provided to ex-public servants and police under the (old schemes) simply be subject to the same taxation restrictions that apply to other (national) pensions and taxpayers. How long can we subsidise ex-public servants on generous penions whilst they enjoy addition employment without reasonable restrictions and accountability that applies to the overwhelming majority of workers/taxpayers in this state. They continue to a pension because they cannot work for the Govt, but are well able to work in the private sector. There are examples of ex-police who cannot work now getting pensions, whilst being fully employed by another Govt department. 
 
I appreiate that this is a difficult position given that this may well impact on ex-politicians, but I believe this is an anomally that provides unfair advantage to a select few within our community. I do not advocate any restrictions on the pension itself, however I do advocate equality for the majority of the hard working constituants.  
 
I believe that reasonable restrictions (possibly allowing ‘capped’ additional income would provide substantial saving to the Government and the community. The savings would be significant, and provide evidence of a NSW Government being financially responsible. 
 
Kind Regards 
R.M.Deans
Posted by: R.M.Deans at 17-06-2011 13:44