Add to:

Facebook! MySpace! Reddit! Del.icio.us! Google! Yahoo! Live! StumbleUpon! Newsvine!

How would you rate Northern Beaches public transport over the past year:
     
Change Font Size: A A A A
Freshwater Development Proposal
Thursday, 10 June 2010

 
Mr MIKE BAIRD (Manly) [6.08 p.m.]: Tonight I draw the attention of the House to the threat to Freshwater, a unique village on the northern beaches of which I am very proud. A proposal has been put forward for a $100 million residential-retail development, which, according to the numbers I have seen, comprises a $60 million development plus the value of the site. Freshwater is special to me because my wife and I purchased our first home there. We chose the property because of the unique nature of the village, the fantastic beach, the proximity of the suburb to Manly and the friendliness of the community. Although it was 16 or 17 years ago, it remains a place that I am very proud to serve as part of my electorate and I still feel it is my home. Recently I attended a community meeting of 350 people. The meeting was unique in that it was cordial, constructive, united and passionate in its unanimous opposition to what is deemed to be a proposal that challenges the very fabric of the community that I am so proud to represent and to be part of.

The Friends of Freshwater Village, headed by Peter Harley, are campaigning for a village master plan to make sure that modern urban design principles are applied, public amenity is maintained, traffic impacts are minimised, and the fabric of Freshwater Village is preserved. More than 330 people have shown their support for the campaign through a Facebook group, which I encourage people to join. Local residents will gather at the site this Saturday to assess the likely impact of this inappropriate development.

Freshwater development application No. 0697/2010 proposes the demolition of the existing buildings at 5-19 Lawrence Street, 22A Albert Street and 18-22 Marmora Road, Freshwater, a site covering 9,565.6 square metres; the development of a four-storey mixed-use building, incorporating floor-level retail and shop-top housing fronting Lawrence Street consisting of 2,521 square metres of retail space and 16 units; the construction of a five-storey mixed-use building of 30 units; the construction of a three-storey residential flat building consisting of 17 units; the construction of a three-storey mixed-use building fronting Albert Street containing retail space and 22 residential flats; and the construction of two levels of basement car parking containing 337 car parking spaces, as well as a loading dock and three garages located at the dwellings fronting Marmora Street. The proposal also includes the development of three detached dwellings and seven townhouses, the construction of a private communal pool and gym, as well as the removal of trees.

It is not difficult to understand the community's outrage at such a proposal: it is out of step with the village and with the community's desires. Clearly, given the facts, the proposed development contravenes the local development guidelines under both the draft local environmental plan for Warringah as well as the existing local environmental plan 2000. The proposal is inconsistent with the development standards within both zones—R2 low-density residential zone and B2 local-centre zone—under the draft Warringah local environmental plan. The proposal is non-compliant with the maximum height restrictions as it exceeds the maximum height by up to 50 per cent, and it fails to comply with development standards relating to front boundary setbacks. The proposal is completely at odds with the zonal objectives for the low-density residential zone, which aims "to provide for the housing needs of the community within a low-density residential environment (and) to ensure that low-density residential environments are characterised by landscaped settings that are harmonious with the natural environment of Warringah".

The proposal also offends the desired character statements for both localities—H1, regarding Freshwater Beach, and H2, regarding Harbord Village—under the existing Warringah local environmental plan 2000. For example, the Freshwater Beach locality is to "remain characterised by detached-style housing in landscaped settings interspersed by existing apartment-style housing and a range of complementary and compatible uses … The streets will be characterised by landscaped front gardens and consistent front building setbacks". The proposal does not comply with development controls within either locality under the relevant development control plan. Within the Freshwater Beach locality, the proposal does not comply with housing density standards, maximum building height, or requirements for landscaped open space. Within the Harbord Village locality, the proposal does not comply with maximum building height standards, front building setbacks, or requirements for landscaped open space.

The Friends of Freshwater Village are happy to have an upgrade of existing buildings. Indeed, across the road there is a development that complies with the existing local environmental plan. I refer to the Cavill development. If that development were to be replicated in some way, shape or form, the community would find it acceptable—or certainly much more acceptable than what has been proposed. I call on the Minister for Planning to look at this proposal with much haste, and to listen to the calls from the Freshwater community opposing a development that would potentially damage and destroy the very fabric that makes Freshwater Village so special.

 

Add to:

Facebook! MySpace! Reddit! Del.icio.us! Google! Yahoo! Live! StumbleUpon! Newsvine!

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
Name:
E-mail
Subject:
Comment:

Code:* Code




Comments (12)
RSS comments
Freshwater Village Development Proposal
Great speech Mike - highlights everything that is wrong with the proposal.
Posted by: Mark Williams at 11-06-2010 09:35
Standing up for Freshwater
Well Done Mike Baird for standing up for Freshwater Village. Its fantastic to see our State MP taking the grassroots voices straight into Parliament. Keep up the great work!
Posted by: Trudy van der Straaten at 11-06-2010 09:46
Freshwater Development Proposal
It's a bloody outrage that they can come in and errect a monster of a building which is clearly going to stick out like a sore thumb. The question here is who stands to gain the most from it? Not the residents that's for sure. Leave the village alone!
Posted by: Dean at 11-06-2010 10:08
I agree
I was just discussing this with the shop owners today at my visit to Freshwater Village and one in particular told me how she would be shut down and out of work. I suspect many more would be just like her. As a Freshwater resident I do not see why we need this development. We have access to major supermarkets in Brookvale, Manly and Dee Why. We like our local shops and feel they should be supported not destroyed. Our family moved here because we loved the village atmosphere and I suspect many others did also. There is no need to ruin what is a beautiful location.
Posted by: Savannah at 11-06-2010 12:33
Freshwater Village Proposal.............
Can`t these developers ever stop!!!! Wonderful speech Mike, keep hammering at them till they drop. Leave Freshwater alone to the community. Regards Debra Arena.
Posted by: Debra Arena at 11-06-2010 13:26
Selfish and narrow minded attitude lets
Having exposure to not only Sydney, but other major cities around the world, I find the attitude of a minority group such as the friends of freshwater so at odds with the interests of Sydneysiders as a whole. I would prefer that Sydney retain its old world charm, but house prices continue to increase through lack of housing, housing that this proposal and many others would seek to provide. There is clearly a shortage of housing in Sydney and this only shuts young people out of owning a home. Old residents in their comfortable homes can rant an rave about house prices going up, but having seen the plans and proposal, find their objection to this project to be another beat up on property developers. It seems no one wants medium density housing, but just like taxes, its something we must face in the future to accomodate new arrivals and young peoples housing needs. Grow up Freshie and do your bit!
Posted by: Mikey Stucatso at 11-06-2010 17:16
Freshwater Development Proposal
Great work Mike Baird. This development sounds criminal.
Posted by: Craig Bowra at 11-06-2010 20:35
Telstra building needs to go
Dear Mike, 
Thanks for giving up your time to get involved in the fight to save Freshwater Village and for your speech. I grew up a block away from the "village" - when it was just "Harbord shops". I went to Harbord School and (then) Manly Girls' High, all within Freshwater's boundaries. I feel ill about the threat to its mainstreet and the apparent lack of timely input the NSW planning process allows vulnerable communities.  
After Peter Harley's excellent and informative "tour" today, I wonder if you could take up the matter of the ugly five-storey Telstra building, which is preposterously being used as a precedent for additional height in the DA. If redundant as a communications facility, can we ask for this eyesore to be demolished, the phone towers relocated and to reclaim the site (from the Crown?) as public open green space? It would make an ideal community garden, for example, to serve the coming increased density and to redress some of the loss of precious village interaction to come. I hope you can find the time in your busy schedule to make some enquiries to that effect, thank you. 
Best regards, 
Cr Virginia Laugesen
Posted by: Virginia Laugesen at 12-06-2010 16:50
Freshwater Vilage proposal
Mike Baird 
Your address in Parliament covered the issues succinctly. I'd be happy to add my name to a petition. It's great that you are putting your weight behind the opposition to the proposed development. 
Best wishes 
Sue-Ann Mathews
Posted by: Sue-Ann Mathews at 14-06-2010 10:12
Freshwater Village Development
I agree that this proposal is not acceptable. It is an over development of the site and will, I'm sure , further exacerbate traffic problems with it's major increase in accomodation. 
I have been told that this will be a security gated residential complex. If this is true it is entirely out of sync with the village tradition. 
Aesthetically the design is out of character with the notion of a village; as is the monstrosity facing it from across the road. We don't want another mistake. 
And I feel for the existing business owners who have worked hard to build their businesses, only to have them destoyed by a group of people who are only interested in making as much money as they can and to hell with everyone else. 
Roger Shackleton
Posted by: Roger Shackleton at 15-06-2010 09:48
Freshwater Village Development Proposal
I understand more than most, that there is a great shortage of affordable housing and that this needs to be addressed. My family struggled for years to eventually be able to afford a small unit in Freshwater. However I feel strongly that it was worth the struggle and sacrifice. This development plan will destroy the village atmosphere and is a complete waste of an opportunity to create something that is beneficial both to the developers and to the community. Once it is built there will be no going back, and it will no doubt set a precedent for any other developers who will be watching this with great interest.
Posted by: Kim Robinson at 15-06-2010 11:22
Video link about the proposed developmen
Here is a link to a video in which Peter Harley from The Friends of Freshwater Village takes concerned residents on a tour of the proposed controversial development site http://www.youtube.com/upsidedowntv
Posted by: Danny from UpsideDown Producti at 21-07-2010 14:53